Digital libraries sleep away the web 2.0

1. Oktober 2008 um 23:58 3 Kommentare

Frome time to time still publish on paper, so I have to deposit the publication in a repository to make it (and its metadata) available; mostly I use the „open archive for Library and Information Science“ named E-LIS. But each time I get angry because uploading and describing a submission is so complicated – especially compared to popular commercial repositories like flickr, slideshare youtube and such. These web applications pay a lot attention to usability – which sadly is of low priority in many digital libraries.

I soon realized that E-LIS uses a very old version (2.13.1) of GNU EPrints – EPrints 3 is available since December 2006 and there have been many updates since then. To find out whether it is usual to run a repository with such an outdated software, I did a quick study. The Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) should list all relevant public repositories that run with EPrints. With 30 lines of Perl I fetched the list (271 repositories), and queried each repository via OAI to find out the version number. Here the summarized result in short:

76 x unknown (script failed to get or parse OAI response), 8 x 2.1, 18 x 2.2, 98 x 2.3, 58 x 3.0, 13 x 3.1

Of 195 repositories (that I could successfully query and determine the version number of) only 13 use the newest version 3.1 (released September 8th). Moreover 124 still use version 2.3 or older. EPrints 2.3 was released before the web 2.0 hype in 2005! One true point of this web 2.0 bla is the concept of „perpetual beta“: release early but often and follow user feedback, so your application will quickly improve. But most repository operators do not seem to have a real interest in improvement and in their users!

Ok, I know that managing and updating a repository server is work – I would not be the right guy for such a job – but then don’t wail over low acceptance or wonder why libraries have an antiquated image. For real progress one should perpetually do user studies and engage in the developement of your software. Digital libraries with less resources should at least join the Community and follow updates to keep up to date.

P.S: E-LIS has updated its software now (November 2008). A lot of missing features remain but those need to be implemented in EPrints first.


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Hi all,
    I’m the technician who is behind E-LIS. The problem for updating the software is simple: lack of time, it is difficult to migrate and the first stable release of Eprints 3.0 is Eprints 3.0.5. (april 2008) and rocky stable is only 3.1 (september 2008).

    The history of releases is available at

    In fact EP3 is much better of EP 2.3. But the migration is like using a new software.

    Comment by Zeno Tajoli — 2. Oktober 2008 #

  2. Hi Jakob!

    As Zeno said, we are working on the migration. It is not that simple since we had a lot of customized features, stuff and things 🙁

    However, I am not sure that the submission process in the Eprints 3.0 is going to be so simple as you said. Please have a look at the demo that Southampton has online at I would like to receive your feedback as we are going to finish our work very soon and we haven’t made any change to the submission workflow by default in eprints 3.0. So any comment from you is more than welcome!

    With my best wishes from Rome

    Comment by Imma Subirats — 3. Oktober 2008 #

  3. […] Oktober hatte ich mich noch geärgert, dass viele Repositories der Entwicklung hinterherhinken; zumindest E-LIS ist nun wieder auf dem […]

    Pingback by E-LIS Repository auf EPrints 3 aktualisiert « Jakoblog — Das Weblog von Jakob Voß — 4. Dezember 2008 #

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.