<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: First complete draft of DAIA Ontology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jakoblog.de/2010/01/07/first-complete-draft-of-daia-ontology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jakoblog.de/2010/01/07/first-complete-draft-of-daia-ontology/</link>
	<description>Das Weblog von Jakob Voß</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:20:52 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://jakoblog.de/2010/01/07/first-complete-draft-of-daia-ontology/comment-page-1/#comment-237134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakoblog.de/?p=782#comment-237134</guid>
		<description>The problem is not to map XML Schema to OWL but to find the right data model which can be mapped to both XML Schema and OWL and vice versa. Both XSD and OWL are only serialization languages for a model of the universe of discourse. I think I&#039;ll better draw some diagrams to catch this meta-meta-modeling issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not to map XML Schema to OWL but to find the right data model which can be mapped to both XML Schema and OWL and vice versa. Both XSD and OWL are only serialization languages for a model of the universe of discourse. I think I&#8217;ll better draw some diagrams to catch this meta-meta-modeling issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jonathan Rochkind</title>
		<link>http://jakoblog.de/2010/01/07/first-complete-draft-of-daia-ontology/comment-page-1/#comment-236478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakoblog.de/?p=782#comment-236478</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the ability to mix and match XML from different schemas in the same document using namespaces and external declerations in schemas... seems kind of &quot;open world&quot; to me. No?

But I confess that I still don&#039;t entirely understand (the attraction of? or just plain...) RDF. 

If you wanted to talk more about the troubles you had turning an XML schema into OWL-for-RDF, it would probably be helpful to some of us in understanding some things about the RDF world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the ability to mix and match XML from different schemas in the same document using namespaces and external declerations in schemas&#8230; seems kind of &#8220;open world&#8221; to me. No?</p>
<p>But I confess that I still don&#8217;t entirely understand (the attraction of? or just plain&#8230;) RDF. </p>
<p>If you wanted to talk more about the troubles you had turning an XML schema into OWL-for-RDF, it would probably be helpful to some of us in understanding some things about the RDF world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
